|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
* School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, and Institute of Earth
Science and Engineering, University of Auckland
PB92019, Auckland Mail
Centre, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
E-mail:
cjn.wilson{at}auckland.ac.nz
Pyroclastic deposits and lava flows generated by supereruptions are similar to, but tens of times larger than, those observed in historic eruptions. Physical processes control eruption styles, which then dictate what products are available for sampling and how well the eruption sequence can be determined. These erupted products and their ordering in time permit reconstruction of the parental magma chamber. Supervolcanoes also have smaller eruptions that provide snapshots of magma chamber development in the lead-in to and aftermath of supereruptions. Many aspects of supereruption dynamics, although on a vast scale, can be understood from observations or inferences from smaller historic and prehistoric events. However, the great diversity in the timings of supereruptions and in the eruptive behaviour of supervolcanoes present continuing challenges for research.
KEYWORDS: explosive eruption, ignimbrite, fall deposit, Yellowstone, Long Valley, Taupo
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. F. Miller and D. A. Wark SUPERVOLCANOES AND THEIR EXPLOSIVE SUPERERUPTIONS Elements, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 11 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Bachmann and G. Bergantz The Magma Reservoirs That Feed Supereruptions Elements, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 17 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Self and S. Blake Consequences of Explosive Supereruptions Elements, February 1, 2008; 4(1): 41 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |